Summary of the paper
| Title | Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text? |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Hardcastle and Donia Scott |
| Abstract | Evaluating the output of NLG systems is notoriously difficult, and performing assessments of text quality even more so. A range of automated and subject-based approaches to the evaluation of text quality have been taken, including comparison with a putative gold standard text, analysis of specific linguistic features of the output, expert review and task-based evaluation. In this paper we present the results of a variety of such approaches in the context of a case study application. We discuss the problems encountered in the implementation of each approach in the context of the literature, and propose that a test based on the Turing test for machine intelligence offers a way forward in the evaluation of the subjective notion of text quality. |
| Language | Single language |
| Topics | Evaluation methodologies, Generation, Other |
Full paper |
Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text? |
Slides |
- |
| Bibtex | @InProceedings{HARDCASTLE08.797, author = {David Hardcastle and Donia Scott}, title = {Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text?}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08)}, year = {2008}, month = {may}, date = {28-30}, address = {Marrakech, Morocco}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair), Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Daniel Tapias}, publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)}, isbn = {2-9517408-4-0}, note = {http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/}, language = {english} } |